20 July 2011 – Regular users of Facebook, Twitter and other online social media expect higher levels of corporate responsibility from companies, and are more likely to act on their values as ethical consumers, according to a new GlobeScan 28-nation poll released today.
The poll of 28,889 people reveals that when compared to non-users of social media, regular users hold companies to a higher ethical standard, particularly when it comes to their environmental responsibility, and are also more likely to act on their values as consumers and influencers of others.
In particular, the survey found that while 24 per cent of non-social media users said they had rewarded a socially responsible company, the figure was significantly higher – 31 per cent – among regular social media users. Similarly, while only 17 per cent of non-users said they had punished a socially irresponsible company by criticising them or boycotting their products, 23 per cent of social media users said they had done so. This group is also more likely to say they regularly choose to pay extra for environmentally friendly or ethical products and services, only buy from responsible companies, and that they think socially and environmentally friendly products are of higher quality.
Social media users also tend to view industries that have a higher environmental impact, such as oil companies, as less responsible than do non-regular users.
As well as being more active as ethical consumers, regular social media users feel more empowered to make ethical choices as a consumer. Social media users are also more likely than non-users to say they feel empowered to make a difference in how responsibly companies behave, and that they know a lot about what companies are doing in regards to CSR.
The results of the poll suggest that there are other reasons companies need to pay attention to the ever-growing segment of the population that uses social media. Users are also more likely to possess opinion-leader characteristics, such as being in leadership positions at their workplace or community, support and NGO, and frequently discuss business and politics. Regular social media users are also more likely than non-users to be highly educated with an above-average level of income.
In 2010, research from GlobeScan also confirmed that while the internet had emerged as a major source of information on CSR, a new generation of consumers is turning to less traditional, unofficial sources of information on CSR such as social networks like Facebook or Twitter, while company websites are being left behind by consumers looking for CSR information.
GlobeScan Senior Vice-President Chris Coulter said: “These results show why companies can no longer afford to ignore social media as a channel for communicating their messages around corporate responsibility. Users are more switched-on to ethical business, more empowered, and more influential – and as people look beyond traditional sources of information on corporate responsibility, their attitudes are shaping those of others.”
GlobeScan’s poll of 28,889 citizens in 28 countries was fielded between December 2, 2010 and February 4, 2011. Interviews were conducted face-to-face, or by telephone by GlobeScan and its research partners in each country. In eight of the 28 countries, the sample was limited to major urban areas. The margin of error per country ranges from +/- 2.0 to 4.9 per cent, 19 times out of 20.
Media Contacts
For media interviews with the participating pollsters, please contact:
Sam Mountford, Research Director
GlobeScan Incorporated, London
+44 20 7928 5368
(Mobile: +44 7854 132625)
|
Oliver Martin, Director, Global Development
GlobeScan Incorporated, Toronto +1 416 969 3073 (Mobile: +1 416 721 3544) oliver.martin@globescan.com |
About the GlobeScan Radar
These findings are drawn from the GlobeScan Radar program, a syndicated service offering based on global public opinion research, covering a variety of issues around business in society. GlobeScan has been tracking issues and societal expectations for business across the world since 1999. GlobeScan Radar provides global decision-makers with critical insights and comparative country metrics needed to better understand the trends shaping their international business and policy environment. The research program is designed to help shape corporate strategies, policy positions, initiative development, and communications activities.
Fieldwork was conducted in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, France, Germany, Ghana, Greece, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan, Peru, the Philippines, Portugal, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the USA. Interviews were conducted via face-to-face, by telephone, or online (Japan only) between December 2, 2010 and February 4, 2011. Polling was conducted by GlobeScan and its research partners in each country. Some urban-only surveying was conducted in certain developing countries, following generally accepted research standards in each country. The margin of error per country ranges from +/-3.0 to 4.9 per cent, 19 times out of 20. Full methodology below.
About GlobeScan
GlobeScan is an international opinion research consultancy. Companies, multilateral institutions, governments, and NGOs trust GlobeScan for its unique expertise in reputation research, sustainability, and issues management. GlobeScan provides global organizations with evidence-based insight and advice to help them build strong brands, manage relations with key stakeholders, and define their strategic positioning. GlobeScan conducts research in over 90 countries, is certified to the ISO 9001:2008 standard for its quality management system, and is a signatory to the UN Global Compact. Established in 1987, GlobeScan is an independent, management-owned company with offices in London, Toronto, and San Francisco. www.GlobeScan.com
Methodology
In total 28,889 citizens in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, France, Germany, Ghana, Greece, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan, Peru, the Philippines, Portugal, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the USA were interviewed face-to-face or by telephone between December 2, 2010 and February 4, 2011. Polling was conducted for Radar Wave 1 by GlobeScan and its research partners in each country.
In Brazil, China, Indonesia, Mexico, the Philippines, Portugal, and Turkey urban samples were used. The margin of error per country ranges from +/- 2.0 to 4.9 per cent, 19 times out of 20.
Country | Sample Size (unweighted) | Field dates | Sample frame | Survey methodology | Type of sample |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Argentina | 1015 | December 10-16, 2010 | 18+ | Face-to-face | National |
Australia | 800 | December 4, 2010 – January 14, 2011 | 18+ | Telephone | National |
Brazil | 802 | December 2, 2010 – January 5, 2011 | 18-69 | Face-to-face | Urban1 |
Canada | 902 | December 20, 2010 – January 18, 2011 | 18+ | Telephone | National |
Chile | 1200 | December 10-22, 2010 | 18+ | Face-to-face | National |
China | 1000 | December 18-31, 2010 | 18+ | Telephone | Urban2 |
France | 807 | December 13-17, 2010 | 15+ | Telephone | National |
Germany | 1017 | December 12, 2010 – January 3, 2011 | 16-70 | Telephone | National |
Ghana | 1000 | December 14-29, 2010 | 18+ | Face-to-face | National |
Greece | 1000 | January 3-20, 2011 | 15+ | Telephone | National |
India | 1168 | December 22, 2010 – January 8, 2011 | 18+ | Face-to-face | National |
Indonesia | 1000 | December 6, 2010 – January 11, 2011 | 18+ | Face-to-face | Urban3 |
Italy | 1004 | January 17-28, 2011 | 18+ | Telephone | National |
Japan | 1000 | December 6-7, 2010 | 20–69 | Online | National |
Kenya | 1000 | January 28, 2011 – February 4, 2011 | 18+ | Face-to-face | National |
Mexico | 1000 | December 15, 2010 – January 14, 2011 | 18+ | Telephone | Urban4 |
Nigeria | 1000 | December 16-24, 2010 | 18+ | Face-to-face | National |
Pakistan | 2452 | December 12-26, 2010 | 18+ | Face-to-face | National |
Peru | 1107 | January 4, 2011 – January 11, 2011 | 18-69 | Face-to-face | National |
Philippines | 800 | December 14, 2010 – January 9, 2011 | 18+ | Face-to-face | Urban5 |
Portugal | 1002 | December 9, 2010 – January 17, 2011 | 18-75 | Telephone | Urban6 |
Russia | 1010 | December 23, 2010 – January 18, 2011 | 18+ | Face-to-face | National |
South Africa | 1000 | December 3, 2010 – January 27, 2011 | 18+ | Face-to-face | National |
South Korea | 1000 | January 6-7, 2011 | 19+ | Telephone | National |
Spain | 802 | December 20, 2010 – January 11, 2011 | 18+ | Telephone | National |
Turkey | 1000 | December 8-20, 2010 | 15+ | Face-to-face | Urban7 |
UK | 1001 | December 3-16, 2010 | 18+ | Telephone | National |
USA | 1000 | December 4, 2010 – January 13, 2011 | 18+ | Telephone | National |
- In Brazil the survey was conducted in Belo Horizonte, Brasilia, Curitiba, Goiânia, Porto Alegre, Recife, Rio de Janeiro, Salvador, and São Paulo, representing 18 per cent of the national population.
- In China the survey was conducted in Beijing, Beiliu, Chengdu, Dujiangyan, Fenyang, Fuyang, Guangzhou, Hangzhou, Manzhouli, Quanzhou, Qujing, Shanghai, Shenyang, Shuangcheng, Wuhan, Xi’an, Xining, and Zhengzhou, representing 45 per cent of the national adult population.
- In Indonesia the survey was conducted in Bandung, Jakarta, Makassar, Medan, and Surabaya, representing 27 per cent of the national adult population.
- In Mexico the survey was conducted in Baja California, Chihuahua, Guanajuato, Guerrero, Hidalgo, Jalisco, Mexico City, Michoacán, Morelos, Nuevo León, Oaxaca, Puebla, Sonora, Tamaulipas, Veracruz, and Yucatán, representing 40 per cent of the national adult population and 80 per cent of the residential telephone landlines.
- In the Philippines the survey was conducted in the National Capital Region, representing 27 per cent of the urban adult population.
- In Portugal the survey was conducted in Almada, Amadora, Beja, Braga, Castelo Branco, Évora, Faro, Guarda, Leiria, Lisbon, Loures, Porto, Santarém, Setúbal, Vila Nova de Famalicão, Vila Nova de Gaia, and Viseu, representing 25 per cent of the national adult population.
- In Turkey the survey was conducted in Adana, Ankara, Antalya, Bursa, Diyarbakir, Erzurum, Istanbul, Izmir, Konya, Samsun, and Zonguldak, representing 56 per cent of the national adult population.
Research Partners
Country | Research Institute | Location | Contact |
---|---|---|---|
Argentina | TNS Gallup Argentina | Buenos Aires | Ricardo Hermelo ricardo.hermelo@tns-gallup.com.ar +54 11 4891 6400 |
Australia | GlobeScan | Toronto | Oliver Martin oliver.martin@globescan.com +1 416 969 3073 |
Brazil | Market Analysis | Florianópolis | Fabián Echegaray fabian@marketanalysis.com.br +55 48 3364 0000 |
Canada | GlobeScan | Toronto | Oliver Martin oliver.martin@globescan.com +1 416 969 3073 |
Chile | Mori Chile | Santiago | Marta Lagos mlagos@morichile.cl +56 2334 4544 |
China | GlobeScan | Toronto | Oliver Martin oliver.martin@globescan.com +1 416 969 3073 |
Egypt | Attitude Market Research | Cairo | Mohamed Al Gendy mgendy@attitude-eg.com +202 22711262 |
France | Efficience 3 | Paris and Rheims | Christian de Thieulloy christian.t@efficience3.com +33 1 4316 5442 |
Germany | Ri*QUESTA GmbH | Teningen | Bernhard Rieder riquesta.rieder@t-online.de +49 7641 93 43 36 |
Ghana | Business Interactive Consulting Limited | Accra | Razaaque Animashaun info@bigghana.com +233 302 783140 / +233 302 782892 |
Greece | The Institute of Communication | Athens | Soto Mitroglou smitroglou@ioc.gr +210 3318065 / 7 |
India | Team C Voter | Noida | Yashwant Deshmukh yashwant@teamcvoter.com +91 120 4175200 (ext. 223) |
Indonesia | DEKA Marketing Research | Jakarta | Irma Malibari irma.malibari@deka-research.co.id info@deka-research.co.id +62 21 723 6901 |
Italy | GfK Eurisko s.r.l. | Milan | Paolo Anselmi paolo.anselmi@gfk.com +39 02 438091 |
Japan | S M I S | Tokyo | Yoko Matsumoto y-matsumoto@smis.co.jp |
Kenya | Research Path Associates Ltd. | Nairobi | Jeremy Mwololo jeremy.mwololo@rpa.co.ke +254 020 2734770 |
Mexico | The Mund Group | Mexico City | Cristina Montaño cmontamom@hotmail.com +52 55 5584 3020 / 2470 |
Nigeria | Real Edge Research Options | Lagos | Michael Umogun michael.umogun@realedgeresearch.com +234 802 311 7969 |
Pakistan | Gallup Pakistan | Islamabad | Ijaz Shafi Gilani isb@gallup.com.pk +92 51 2655630 |
Peru | Datum | Lima | Urpi Torrado urpi@datum.com.pe +511 215 0600 |
Philippines | M&S-Sigma Dos Philippines, Inc. | Makati City | Teodora Marasigan tmmarasigan@ms-sigmados.com +63 2 8172780 |
Portugal | Sperantia | Queijas | Sandrine Lage slage@sperantia.pt +351 214 177 418 |
Russia | CESSI Institute for Comparative Social Research | Moscow | Vladimir Andreenkov vladimir.andreenkov@cessi.ru +7 495 650 55 18 |
South Africa | First Principles | Cape Town | Sandrine Lage slage@sperantia.pt +351 214 177 418 |
Spain | Sigma Dos Int. | Madrid | Gines Garrido petrana@sigmados.com +34 91 360 0474 |
Turkey | Yöntem Research Consultancy Ltd. | Istanbul | Bülent Gündoğmuş info@yontemresearch.com mehmet.aktulga@yontemresearch.com melike.kiratli@yontemresearch.com +90 212 278 1219 |
United Kingdom | Populus Data Solutions | London | Patrick Diamond pdiamond@populusdatasolutions.com +44 207 553 4148 |
USA | GlobeScan | Toronto | Oliver Martin oliver.martin@globescan.com +1 416 969 3073 |
Question Wording
OLT1. Now I would like to ask you about a few personal characteristics. Please tell me how much each of the following statements describes you. Please use a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 is not at all like you and 5 is very much like you.
at) You frequently discuss business and political issues.
bt) You are in a leadership position at your workplace or in your community.
c) You regularly use online social media like Facebook or Twitter
d) You actively support non-governmental organizations such as groups who campaign for an environmental or social cause.
2t. I am going to read a list of things some people say should be part of the responsibilities of large companies. For each one, please tell me to what extent you think companies should be held responsible. In answering, please use a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is “not held responsible,” 3 is “held partially responsible” and 5 is “held completely responsible.” Remember, the higher the number, the more responsible. What about . . .?
- Treating all employees and job applicants fairly, regardless of gender, race, religion or sexual orientation
- Applying the same high standards everywhere it operates in the world
- Helping solve social problems like crime, poverty, and lack of education
- Ensuring its products and operations do not harm the environment
- Increasing economic stability in the world
- Reducing human rights abuses in the world
- Providing good quality products and services at the lowest possible price
- Supporting progressive government policies and legislation
- Helping reduce the gap between rich and poor
- Ensuring that all materials it uses to make its products have been produced in a socially and environmentally responsible manner.
- Supporting charities and community projects
- Ensuring that their products are safe and healthy
- Providing long-term financial security for its employees through a job for life and a good retirement pension
3. Please tell me if you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or strongly disagree with each of the following statements.
ASK TO 50% OF SAMPLE IN EACH COUNTRY
a) I only buy products and services from ethical and responsible companies.
b) I regularly choose to pay extra for environmentally friendly or ethical products and services.
ct) As a consumer, I can make a difference in how responsibly a company behaves.
dt) I know a lot about what certain companies are doing to improve their social and environmental performance and give back to society
j) Socially and environmentally responsible products are higher quality than regular products.
5t. Over the past year, have you considered rewarding a socially responsible company by either buying their products or speaking positively about the company to others? Would you say you have . . .?
01 – Not considered doing this
02 – Considered this, but didn’t actually do it, or
03 – You have actually done this in the past year
99 – DK/NA
7t. In the past year, have you considered punishing a company you see as not socially responsible by either refusing to buy their products or speaking critically about the company to others? Would you say you have . . .?
01 – Not considered doing this
02 – Considered this, but didn’t actually do it, or
03 – You have actually done this in the past year
99 – DK/NA
12ta. Please rate each of the following types of companies on how well they fulfill their responsibilities to society. Compared to other types of companies, would you say [INSERT COMPANY TYPE] are . . . ?
01 – Among the very best
02 – Above average
03 – Average
04 – Below average
05 – Among the very worst
VOLUNTEERED (DO NOT READ)
06 – Depends on the company / Some good, some bad
07 – No opinion / Not familiar with this industry
99 – DK/NA
- Banks and finance companies
- Oil/Petroleum companies
- Auto companies
- Clothing and apparel companies
- Chemical companies
- High-tech/computer companies
- Beer companies
- Tobacco companies
- Food companies
- Pharmaceutical companies
- Mining companies
- Telecommunications companies (telephone)
- Alcohol Beverage companies (beer, wine, spirits)
- Electrical generating companies
- Media and entertainment companies